Of Jacques Barzun on FriendFeed

Now that Mr. Barzun has reached 102, the blog title Barzun 100 looks passé. It seems time to start a new forum with a new title, so I have started the group Of Jacques Barzun on FriendFeed. A subscriber of FriendFeed may join the group and contribute to it.

Honoring Jacques Barzun

Jacques Barzun
was born in Créteil, France
on 30 November 1907

My notion about any artist is that we honor him best by reading him, by playing his music, by seeing his plays or by looking at his pictures. We don’t need to fall all over ourselves with adjectives and epithets. Let’s play him more.
— Jacques Barzun, in an interview with John C. Tibbetts

in the offices of Scribner’s in 1987 as the two discuss what became the radio series The World of Robert Schumann.

Note from Jacques Barzun

“I want the many well-wishers — friends and strangers who have greeted me on my recent birthday — to know that I have been greatly moved by these kind messages. I thank everyone for these expressions of good will, which I regret that I cannot acknowledge individually.”

-JB
 

L'Abbaye (1906 1908)

Preview of the Abbay de Créteil segment of a French documentary on Unanimism.

Begin Here

Photo courtesy of webrefdesk.

History Book Club Thread

Works cited in Barzun's From Dawn to Decadence

— cited by ibergus

Forgotten Treasure: Practical Agitation

Jacques Barzun: "Practical Agitation" by John Jay Chapman

— from Los Angeles Times, Forgotten treasures of the last century, from 25 writers, December 22, 2009

Thanks to David Lull.

8 Bells

The Education of the Feelings, especially through music, has another champion, Mr. Brooks. The polymath who persuaded the faculties of Columbia University to add Music Humanities to the curriculum celebrates his 102nd birthday this Monday. Jacques Barzun's "Pleasures of Music" and ear-opening biography of Berlioz deliver emotional insights to the mind-and-heart. Barzun's fusion of intellect with emotion reunifies Mind and provides a theme to savor throughout his abundant works. Encore, Jacques!

8bells, Online comment to the New York Times, Juneau, November 27th, 2009, 6:23 pm

From the Yahoo Group on The Golden Age of Detective Fiction

Probably someone already noted on this list that Barzun had his 102nd birthday on November 30. Doug G, Fri Dec 4, 2009 12:35 am

Friends, What a long, productive life! His “Catalogue of Crime”, though not perfect, introduced me to many writers and books who have given me even greater reading pleasures than any other work of the kind! I probablt could classify it among my ten essential volumes in all fields, together with the Bible and "101 Years Entertainment", to name a couple. And his book on the decline of Western civilization is yet another wonder! Best regards, Enrique F. Bird Picó, Fri Dec 4, 2009 1:25 am

And he likes Berlioz - an unmistakable sign of good taste! Nick Fuller, Fri Dec 4, 2009 4:14 am

Which means that he is exactly one year younger than John Dickson Carr. And his collaborator on A Catalogue of Crime, was born in Carr's home town of Uniontown. Unfortunately, Carr wasn't really to their taste. Nick Fuller, Fri Dec 4, 2009 4:16 am

Well, I hope that longevity is tied to writing about the genre for all of our sakes. Jeffrey Marks, Fri Dec 4, 2009 10:03 am

Has a "great" man or woman ever become the world's oldest person? Eight years or so more and he'll be in the running! I introduced Barzun as a player in this opening historiographical section of mine (of course he's mentioned in many other places) as a thirty-six year old history professor — and this was sixty-five years ago! He was right in the heart of it all when Boucher and Haycraft and Wilson and Chandler were belting it out. Curt, Fri Dec 4, 2009 10:46 am

Most definitely. He and Boucher argued more than agreed. Barzun was very gracious about letting me quote his letters in the Boucher biography. Jeff, Sat Dec 5, 2009 11:04 am

I copied the Barzun-Bouchers letters in the Boucher papers, sounds like you did too. Both Boucher and Haycraft seemed to get rather irritated with him at times. I think they felt his emphasis on the detective novel as "tale" limited the artistic potentialities of the form. I wrote Barzun both in September 2001 (a few days before 9/11) and more recently, over the summer. The first time I got a letter from a secretary telling me he was in too poor health to respond to my letter. Having mostly finished the book, I wrote him more recently but never got a response. I've generally been quite successful communicating with people, including children of authors, with some excellent results, but Professor Barzun sadly has been a
washout for me (I assume he is still living at the same address). Of course I know he's quite, quite old and is physically much weaker, but I understand he still reads (his advice to Pres. Obama was published earlier this year and I believe you said you communicated with him last year?). He's really quite amazing in that respect, perhaps Will Durant and Milton Friedman are the closest other examples of astounding mental longevity (and they died at 96 and 94, respectively). I must confess it's a great disappointment to me that I've never been able to correspond with him, as this book project of mine is — I think it's fair to say — the most Barzunian thing written on detective fiction not by Barzun himself (though I'm not quite as dogmatic). Barzun's Catalogue of Crime, along with Doug Greene's work and Bill Pronzini's and Marcia Muller's 1001 Midnights, did
more to inspire me to read these books and write this manuscript than anything else. I think Barzun would have found my work interesting at some point in his life. When I get round to indexing, he'll be one of the most mentioned names in there! Curt, Sat Dec 5, 2009 11:47 am

I corresponded with Barzun about 9 years ago — we talked about our mutual belief that Crippen may have been innocent (at least of the charges but not of other things); he complimented my Carr biography, telling me he liked JDC personally but not his books, though after my bio he would give them another try (I don't know whether he did); and he said nice things about my Dover anthologies. My view of Barzun's CATALOGUE OF CRIME is that it is fascinating but supremely quirky — he likes "straighforward" writers, often UK, but not those like Carr, Queen, Boucher, Rawson who wrote about bizarre, indeed fantastic, events. I still find that odd, given Barzun's stated belief that detective fiction is a "tale" -- which was exactly Carr's belief. I found him informed and gracious and perfectly willing to discuss his judgments, and I wish him many more birthdays.
Doug G, Sat Dec 5, 2009 12:47 pm

Edmund Opitz on The Art of Thinking (1988)

Now that you have awakened a few billion brain cells and pumped some information into them, your mind will begin to churn out ideas and you’ll be thinking lots of new and exciting thoughts. What is it like to think? Let me quote a few lines from Jacques Barzun, a first-rate thinker: "Thinking is inwardly a haphazard, fitful, incoherent activity. If you could peer in and see thinking going on, it would not look like that trimmed and barbered result, A Thought. Thinking is messy, repetitious, silly, obtuse, subject to explosions that shatter the crucible and leave darkness behind. Then comes another flash, a new path is seen, trod, lost, broken off, and blazed anew. It leaves the thinker dizzy as well as doubtful; he does not know what he thinks until he has thought it, or better, until he has written and riddled it with a persistence akin to obsession."

Once you get hooked on thinking you’ll be irresistibly drawn into writing, and you'll quickly discover that almost no author who relies on the contents of his own mind alone ever wrote a readable essay, let alone a book. Every thinker and writer needs to know how to use reference books and conduct research, and the complete guide to this is the book, The Modern Researcher, by Jacques Barzun and Henry F. Graff. But you cannot stop there; you have to learn to write passable English prose, and there’s no easy way to do that. The most helpful book on writing, in my view, is Barzun's Simple and Direct. If you're interested in knowing how the ancient Greeks went about the chore of putting together a persuasive speech, look into Aristotle's Rhetoric.

— Edmund Opitz, The Liberating Arts, LibertarianChristians.com

See also Reverend Edmund A. Opitz.

Sidelight: "Typing for Professor Barzun" (1939)

From: 20th Century Danny Boy, 1939 Letter from Grace Everett, Re: Bill Everett & Amazing Man.




This ebay page may or may not be available. According to it:

The letter is from Grace Everett the wife of Bill "William" Everett the creator of Amazing Man, Prince Namor the Sub-Mariner and Daredevil. This letter is dated and stamped by the City of New York March 1, 9:30PM, 1939 which was 6 months before the first Prince Namor the Sub-Mariner can out, which in a way is talked about in this letter.

The addressee is "Mrs. A. Carleton Potter, 1 Potter Park, Cambridge, Massachusetts."